Monday, February 28, 2011

Goal for the Day: Why Grease the Squeaky Wheel?

Presently, the news is filled with ongoing coverage of the seemingly rapid decline of one popular sitcom star. His unraveling is actually a longtime coming and not too much of a surprise. Right now, he’s lashing out—making incomprehensible statements and generally embarrassing himself. We can’t help but watch. It’s the fascination of the abomination. He’s become the butt of many jokes which, in some ways, he’s brought upon himself, but are also nonetheless tragic and uncalled for.


This is a soul in trouble. This is a squeaky wheel who is needing grease, but we’re giving him the wrong kind of grease. Sometimes squeaky wheels need to be left to professionals. He’s using this attention to fuel his irrational fires. Let’s just leave him alone. Let’s let his family and professionals talk to him and take care of him.

Our society is filled with people who feed upon the chaos of others. Our energy is better spent taking care of our own issues, our own families, our own hurts and our own triumphs. Let’s save our grease for ourselves and let the other squeaky wheels be tended to by professional mechanics.

Object of the Day: A Black Crystal Penguin Paperweight

In my collection of black crystal animals, the tallest and most regal of the lot is this handsome penguin by the crystal-makers at Val Saint Lambert. I figured that, after seeing all the gents in their tuxes at the Oscars last night, that Mr. Penguin here was the perfect object for this morning.


Val Saint Lambert has been making fine crystal since being founded in Belgium in 1826. They were particularly known for their Art Deco and Art Nouveau masterpieces and are still celebrated for their exciting creations to this day.



Sunday, February 27, 2011

Masterpiece of the Week: Marie, Queen of Hanover, 1861

Marie, Queen of Hanover
German School, 1861
Portrait: Watercolor on Ivory
Frame: Gold, Enamel, Diamonds
The Royal Collection
I just think this is very pretty. This watercolor on ivory miniature painting of Marie, Queen of Hanover is set into a gorgeous blue enamel frame with diamond flower-head spandrels.


The painting by an unknown German artist was presented to Marie by Queen Victoria as a souvenir. The piece was then given to Princess Mary Adelaide who was also the Duchess of Teck. As often happened, the little portrait ended up in the hands of—you guessed it—Queen Mary (of Teck) who managed to get hold of everything.



Sunday Viewing: The Great Lie, 1941

"This picture is going to stink! It's too incredible for words... so it's up to us to rewrite this piece of junk to make it more interesting,"
--Bette Davis to Mary Astor, 1941

Following her great success with The Letter, Bette Davis took a brief vacation during which she bonded with the man who would be her next husband—Arthur Farnsworth. In a relatively good mood, Davis returned to Warner Brothers to be told that she was going to play Maggie Peterson in The Great Lie. Davis was not thrilled with the part nor was she enchanted by the script which she felt was too “soap-opera-ish.”

The story concerned two women, both in love with the same man. One—Maggie, a demure homebody, and the other— Sandra, a famous concert pianist, instantly loathe one another. When the object of their affections—Peter—learns that his marriage to the pianist is invalid, he pursues Maggie, marrying her. But, he’s lost in a plane crash shortly after their wedding. When Sandra reveals she’s expecting Peter’s child, Maggie offers to adopt the fatherless baby and raise it with Peter’s name. This seems like a good idea until Peter is discovered alive. Then, the two women have a war of wits with Sandra threatening to reveal the child’s mother while Maggie wants to keep her great lie going.

(I’d like to add right here that in the Barbara Walters’ interview with Davis posted as “The Sunday Morning Special,” Davis claims she doesn’t know why impersonators always use the line, “Peter, Peter, Peter” and states that she never made a picture with or about anyone named Peter. Not true, says I. Here, George Brent plays “Peter” and she made Dead Ringer with Peter Lawford.)

Following The Letter, Davis had received a great deal of fan mail stating that while they loved her performances, it might be nice for her to play “a good girl.” That motivation combined with her relatively good mood about getting married again lured Davis to accept the good-girl role of Maggie. Davis stated the Maggie was the only character that she played who had any similarity to her real-life persona. Davis was a devoted homemaker and domestic-type who was never quite at ease with all of the Hollywood pomp.

But, who would play Sandra? The initial choice was Miriam Hopkins. Hopkins had played opposite Davis in two pictures and their natural, honest animosity for one another made for excellent scenes and wonderful box office. But, Bette wouldn’t do it. No more Miriam Hopkins! And, so, a suitable alternative was sought. Many actresses were auditioned, but one stood out for Bette—her chum, Mary Astor, who was, conveniently, a skilled pianist.

The director, Edmund Goulding, and producer, Hal Wallis, were not sold on Astor. Filming began without casting the other leading role. This was distressing for Davis who had a difficult time playing the part without knowing how she’d have to adapt to whomever played Sandra. Taking a page from the Joan Crawford Playbook, Davis came down with “Laryngitis” which caused production to halt for a few days. When Davis returned, Astor had been cast as Sandra.

Astor and Davis both agreed that the script was lousy and conspired to rewrite the picture together, adding business and dialogue which showcased the strange relationship between the two women. The result is a very crisp film. Davis admitted that she handed the picture to Astor “on a silver tray,” but enjoyed working with the woman and enjoyed the challenge. Both—along with George Brent and Hattie McDaniel—give excellent performances.

The film was not without further production troubles. For a long while, the baby playing “Pete” was ill. This caused delays in the picture. Then, that baby was dropped by the nurse who was meant to be taking care of him on-set. The child was badly injured and had to be replaced. The baby’s parents sued Warner Brothers for an undisclosed amount.

Regardless of the shadow of Miriam Hopkins and all the baby-dropping, the finished product is superb. The film is available on DVD and makes for a wonderful bit of Sunday afternoon viewing.



Sunday Morning Special: Barbara Walters’ Interview with Bette Davis

On this Oscar day, it seems appropriate to showcase one of the greats—two-time Oscar winner Bette Davis.  Miss Davis enjoyed a long and amazing career, but she also suffered many tragic losses and setbacks in her personal life.  By the 1980’s, Miss Davis had battled cancer, a stroke and a broken hip, but the biggest blow was dealt by her daughter B.D. Hyman whose scurrilous book about her mother devastated the plucky Oscar winner.  In this late 1980’s interview with Barbara Walters, a post-stroke Bette Davis talks about her career and getting older.  Puffing on a cigarette, she showed herself to be wholly unsinkable.  We should all be so resilient.

Reminder: "Punch's Cousin" Will Return on Monday

Last week, Punch’s Cousin introduced a new character—Charles Van Eyck. Charles has quickly become a friend of Julian’s sister, Barbara Allen, who suggested that the man would be the perfect candidate for the role of valet to her brother. Charles arrived at the Royal Street mansion where Julian/Punch and his companions were staying and swiftly impressed Cecil and Adrienne with his charm and good looks. Robert’s introduction to the man was less than positive when Robert deftly realized that Charles’ references had been forged. Mr. Punch/Julian—still recovering from his gunshot wound—ventured downstairs (much to Robert’s chagrin) and was introduced to his potential new valet. Mr. Punch made a case to employ Charles, later explaining to Robert that he saw it as an opportunity to get through to Barbara Allen. Robert agreed to hire the man. Later, alone with Charles, Mr. Punch pointed out that he knew the man was lying about his name—noticing that Charles’ cuff buttons bore another set of intials. Charles confessed that his real name was Carlo Iantosca and remarked that he, too, had a troublesome sibling.


Meanwhile, Ulrika Rittenhosue received quite a shock when she arrived in her bedroom to find a bloody note left in the bed where Arthur had been. It seems Iolanthe Evangeline had shanghaied Arthur, kidnapping the man and sending him to work on as a hand on a ship. Iolanthe’s terms were simple. Return the diamond and Arthur will be returned. Ulrika rushed to Iolanthe’s house to do battle with the Elegant Ogress, but soon found that she was out-matched. Or was she? Ulrika found herself in a seedy shop where she intended to have a glass copy of the Molliner Blue made. Will Ulrika’s ruse fool Iolanthe? If not, how will “The Ogress” react to yet another deception from the ginger-haired troublemaker.

This week, we’ll learn more about Charles as he grows closer to Barbara Allen. How will Barbara react when she learns about her husband’s abduction? Will she accept Ulrika’s offer to join forces against Iolanthe? What of Marie Laveau? Marie’s got plans for Charles and Barbara? How will the interference of the Voodoo Queen affect Mr. Punch and his companions? Meanwhile, Punch explains to Robert why Julian can never know the secret that Punch has been keeping for nearly thirty years. Robert gets word that his practice in London is failing. Will they return to Blighty? Similarly, Marjani has some troubles of her own as she finds herself called in a direction she hadn’t counted on.

Punch’s Cousin will begin another exciting week on Monday. I can’t wait to share it all with you.


Goal for the Day: Don’t Make the TV the Center of the House

While we all watch television and need the diversion, from the standpoint of interior design, the TV should not be the center of the room. If the television is the first thing you see when you enter a room, what does that say about you?


Your home should reflect your values and tastes. Of course, the TV should be visible and easily seen for viewing, but we don’t need to design the entire room around it. The television is a tool, an appliance. You wouldn’t create a shrine to your refrigerator, so why erect an altar to the television.

By downplaying the importance of the TV in the space, you’re allowing yourself a chance to express yourself better—your creativity, your passions and your spirit. These last longer than any television program.