Medina's portrait of Dorian |
Oscar Wilde posed this question in his only published novel, 1891’s The Picture of Dorian Gray. We’re all familiar with the novel which tells the tale of the handsome Dorian Gray whose beauty so impresses his friend Basil Hallward, a painter. Upon painting Dorian’s portrait, Basil reluctantly introduces Dorian to a Lord Henry Wotton who, in turn, introduces Dorian to the concept of hedonism. Under Lord Henry’s influence, Dorian’s desire to remain youthful and comely costs him his soul. The portrait that Basil painted will age while Dorian will remain physically uncorrupted. However, Dorian’s soulless and increasingly debauched and depraved behavior shows in the painted flesh of the portrait, and, soon Dorian reaches new depths of corruption as he tries to hide his secret. The novel is a multi-layered masterpiece, rich with meaning—a true work of art.
Hatfield and Sanders |
Rounding out the cast was the perennially creepy George Sanders as Lord Henry, and Angela Lansbury (in only her third film role, most notably following her brilliant turn in Gaslight) as music hall singer, Sybil Vane. The picture also features a young Donna Reed and Peter Lawford.
While the script writers took liberties with the original text—toning down some of the references to Dorian’s lifestyle and introducing a very-Hollywood plot device of a mystical Egyptian cat sculpture—the film captures the spirit of Wilde’s novel very nicely.
Albright's Dorian |
When you watch it, keep looking at the toy blocks under the table in the upper-story room where Dorian hides the picture. Just a bit of trivia…
4 comments:
I love this movie! Angela Landsbury sings "Goodbye Little Yellow Bird" and it's so sad.
Miss Lansbury's portrayal of Sybil Vane is very touching. She has such an innocence about her--the total opposite of her first film role as the tart-y maid in "Gaslight."
What a wonderful post, Joseph! Well-crafted and also deeply informative. I agree with you that Wilde's The Picture of Dorian Gray is a brilliant novel with many layers of meaning and subtext. Interestingly, Wilde was pressured by his publisher to add the Sybil Vane subplot to the book, in order to make the novel's prose seem less "purple." So the original 1890 serial version of the novel differs substantially from the revised 1891 edition. But Wilde wrote in the additional chapters very cleverly, so as to make clear the fact that he'd been coerced to revise the book in this way.
I appreciate that, Jason. Thank you for pointing out the differences between the Lippincott's version and the 1891 published version. Indeed, he was forced to make many changes. Clearly, he was not terribly thrilled about it. Thank you for your contribution!
Post a Comment